In a recent analysis of the companies that make up the Global 2000, nearly three quarters implemented less than half of all domain security measures. As attacks targeting domains continue to rise, it is critical to determine who is responsible for overseeing their security and the processes they implement.
With risks being discovered by a wide range of security tools, how can vulnerability management teams ensure their vulnerability risk management programs are actually targeting the highest-priority risks and therefore supporting ongoing cybersecurity goals? When these tools and their findings are siloed, the answer is, unfortunately, simple: they can’t.
When it comes to web applications, there is no substitute for a thorough penetration test. A comprehensive penetration test also offers visibility into blind spots within the application’s attack surface, giving teams a chance to plan ahead and keep attackers from succeeding.
Zero trust will not stop over 50% of attacks by 2026 because only 10% of large firms will have mature programs, and hackers will expand the attack surface beyond zero trust coverage.
The software supply chain attack surface is a lot more complicated now, and can be compromised at every stage. Developers are the new high-value targets and we have seen developers fall victim to stolen credentials and secrets, compromised workstations, CI/CD attacks and malicious packages that end up in source code.
Factoring External Attack Surface Management (EASM) into the equation means the math is clear for all. Insurance companies can better justify premium prices, while companies can demonstrate their cyber posture when applying for cybersecurity insurance.