Digital Ukraine badge

Viktor Prokopenya: Navigating the Challenges of Digital Warfare

The growing threat of Russian cyber-attacks on Ukraine has highlighted the urgent need to address this warfare in the modern world. With an alarming history of targeted attacks on civilian infrastructure and recent incidents affecting whole nations, the implications of these cyber assaults cannot be ignored.

Viktor Prokopenya suggests looking at Ukraine’s experience in cyber warfare. As a renowned entrepreneur and founder of Capital.com, Prokopenya has had a firsthand experience with the devastating effects of Russian cyber-attacks. His company in London was subjected to a massive “distributed denial of service” attack after Prokopenya announced it would cease operations in Russia to protest the invasion of Ukraine and donate £1m to Ukrainian charities.

Note: A “distributed denial of service” or DDoS attack involves numerous computers worldwide overwhelming a company’s website with requests, aiming to overwork it and potentially cause a shutdown.

Ukraine’s Battleground: A History of Russian Cyber Aggression

First, let’s turn to history. Throughout the years, Ukraine has faced a series of relentless cyber-attacks orchestrated by Russian actors. The extent of these attacks underscores the severity of the threat. Notable instances include:

  • Infrastructure Disruption: In December 2015, SandWorm utilised BlackEnergy malware to trigger widespread blackouts in Ukraine, and a year later, in December 2016, they caused further disruptions to Ukraine’s power grid with the Industroyer/CrashOverride attack, leading to blackouts in Kyiv.
  • Global Ransomware Attacks: In June 2017, the Russian military launched a ransomware attack from Ukraine, known as Petya/NotPetya, which caused widespread disruption.
  • Malware Targeting Network Devices: In May 2018, Fancy Bear’s VPNFilter malware-infected routers and NAS devices, with Ukraine being significantly impacted.
  • Phishing and Social Media Exploitation: FROZENBARENTS and FROZENLAKE conducted extensive phishing campaigns targeting users and sectors in Ukraine, with FROZENBARENTS additionally exploiting platforms like Telegram for information dissemination and further phishing efforts.
  • Financially Motivated Attacks: Threat actors targeted Ukrainian officials for intelligence and possible financial gain.

These attacks are alarming reminders of the sophisticated cyber weaponry employed by Russia and the grave consequences they entail for Ukrainian society.

Russian cyber-attacks pose a global threat, as seen in major breaches at UK entities like British Airways, Boots, and the BBC by Russian-speaking criminals, compromising tens of thousands of employees’ personal data, underscoring the global urgency for improved cybersecurity.

Cyber Warfare’s Changing Landscape

Victor Prokopenya describes his own experience of cyber attacks as bizarre. “It feels like somebody trying to break down your front door, every second of every day, for three long months”.

He also highlights the evolving nature of this global conflict, as the sophistication of these attacks has reached unprecedented levels thanks to targeted cyberattacks and strategic information manipulation. The private sector and critical infrastructure now find themselves on the frontlines, making it imperative for governments, corporations, and global security agencies to collaborate in combating this multifaceted threat.

Already, cyber attacks are having a significant negative impact on civilian infrastructure, however, such attacks are not on the list of war crimes under the Geneva Conventions.

Legal experts and researchers have previously made the case for the ICC to prosecute Russian cyberattacks. But now Ukrainian officials, as a sovereign government, have taken the initiative by sharing information about Russian cyber-attacks with the International Criminal Court (ICC), urging investigations into potential war crimes. The interpretation of existing laws, such as Article 8 of the Rome Statute, should encompass the destructive potential of cyber-attacks and their parallel with physical destruction. The ICC must adapt to the complexities of 21st-century “hybrid” warfare.

In 2022, the British government unveiled a Cyber Security Strategy to tackle cybercrime. However, Victor Prokopenya stresses that there are few proposals in the document for legislation that is badly needed to improve cybersecurity. Updating the Computer Misuse Act to combat emerging cyber-crimes, addressing data protection and online child safety, protecting critical infrastructure, and safeguarding intellectual property rights are paramount to ensuring national security in the digital era.

Ukraine’s Resilience: Lessons to Learn

In the face of relentless cyber aggression, Ukraine has displayed remarkable resilience. Viktor Prokopenya highlights the creation of a volunteer cyber force as a prime example of Ukraine’s innovative response.

An important point is that their activities are supported and to some extent sanctioned by the Ukrainian government, although such involvement is officially denied. The department that created the telegram team for the IT Army of Ukraine grouping is supervised by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Innovation, Development of Education, Science and Technology of Ukraine, Mikhail Fedorov.

The most interesting Ukrainian cyberattack cases:

  • An attack on Honest Mark, Russia’s mandatory product labelling system. Using a DDoS attack, hackers found a way to disable the service, resulting in significant economic losses for Russia.
  • Over 800 Russian websites, including Roscosmos, were attacked, with congratulatory messages posted for Ukrainian Constitution Day.
  • The IT Army targeted the Moscow Stock Exchange and Sberbank, rendering the websites inaccessible in just five minutes.
  • Hackers invaded Russian radio systems, transmitting false air-raid alarms and the need to take shelter in bomb shelters.
  • Collaboration with Anonymous: The group collaborated with Anonymous to cause a traffic jam in Moscow by attacking Yandex Taxi’s systems.

As Viktor Prokopenya says, these responses serve as a model for other nations. Enhanced proactive defenses, innovative approaches to cybersecurity, and collaboration between public and private sectors are strategies that can be used by countries to create a secure digital future resistant to cyber threats.

About Viktor Prokopenya

Viktor Prokopenya is a British technology entrepreneur and investor originally from Belarus. Founder of investment company VP Capital. He contributed to the adoption of the Decree on Digital Economy in Belarus in 2017. Still, despite this, Viktor Prokopenya was forced out of Belarus during the policies pursued by Alexander Lukashenko.

 

Staff Writer at CPO Magazine