The CCPA went into effect at the start of 2020, providing two complete years of data at this point. The total number of data subject requests just about doubled from one year to the next.
An increase in cyber attacks and claims is challenging for the cyber insurance business. Insurers have made changes in response: narrowing the parameters for coverage, increasing prices, and introducing new requirements for cover.
The new Bipartisan Infrastructure Law as well as the American Rescue Plan Act allocated government funding for cybersecurity efforts, but public entities to date have not moved as quickly as most consider prudent. That appears to be changing.
While compliance leaders must have an abundance of technical prowess, truly successful compliance executives today are the ones that seamlessly blend hard with soft skills.
Many cyber insurance providers are now requiring basic security hygiene from their customers. One of those requirements is multi-factor authentication (MFA), which adds a layer of protection to sign-in processes.
This year will usher in a new round of regulations concerning consumer data, making it an opportune time to take a look at why privacy compliance is complex and how we can make it less so.
As consumers demand greater corporate responsibility for their personal information, business and technology leaders face an ever-expanding list of challenges pertaining to cybersecurity and privacy of customer data.
The quick transition to the Zero-Trust model is mainly fueled by remote work, cloud adoption and an increase in deploying devices in recent years. Having the right security solutions to support a Zero-Trust strategy is critical. Here are three keys to implement a Zero-Trust approach successfully.
Where there is data, there is a risk of a data breach. It is essential to implement protective measures for such an event and to educate oneself to spot a potential breach.
Google’s latest differential privacy tools are a step in the right direction but still have a few limitations when it comes to protecting consumer privacy. The approach doesn’t account for who decides what level of “noise” will appropriately protect user privacy.
